On Tuesday, September 11th, an armed mob attacked the U.S. Consulate in Libya. Four Americas were killed, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya and several Libyans. Preceding the attack, there was an Anti-Islamic video made by an American which sparked fire that pushed the mob into action.
“The demonstrators in Cairo cited an obscure movie made in the United States by a filmmaker who calls Islam a “cancer.” Video excerpts posted on YouTube depict the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud, a womanizer and a madman in an overtly ridiculing way, showing him having sex and calling for massacres.”
Late Tuesday night, the mob stormed the Consult, climbed the walls, and the attack began.
On Wednesday morning, Mitt Romney made a statement about the attack. He begins by saying that we are all saddened by this loss, and that is was a cowardly disgusting act, he then speaks of how we, as Americans, will not stand for this sort of attack on our people, and continues with a personal attack on Obama.
“I also believe the administration was wrong to stand by a statement sympathizing with those who had breached our embassy in Egypt, instead of condemning their actions. It’s never too early for the United States government to condemn attacks on Americans and to defend our values.”
Romney speaks of how Obama should not have apologized for the video, when in reality Obama did nothing of the sort. When Romney was later questioned on his statement, and accused of speaking before he had all of the facts, he stood by what he had said earlier.
Obama made a timely speech concerning all that had happened, promising to deliver justice upon those who did the senseless killing, but that was not forceful enough to please Romney, who was much more focused on how America needs to prove its power, and he focused very little on the actual tragedy itself.
Romney is desperate for any lead that he can grab on to in the polls, and struggles to appeal to the people who are looking for a strong vicious leader to take them on a path of vengeance and self-righteousness. Romney saw this attack as a political opportunity.
While in our past, at times of great tragedy such as September 11th, 2001, we as a nation have stood by our president, and stood together as a people. Romney has done the opposite in making this a political stunt.
Imagine if instead of attacking our president, Romney had stood by him. If he had called Obama, and asked what he could do to help. If our two potential leaders could have stood together in this crisis and delivered a speech for all of the American people. A speech not attacking one another, but grieving together for those lost.
todd buchanan
September 17, 2012
Dona, I thought your last paragraph was a great idea. Similarly, in hindsight I wish Obama, rather than firing back at Romney, had invited him to a private meeting to coordinate their responses, or at least to look at the same intelligence. Others might say both suggestions are naive, but I think they would have been classy.
Tony Robinson
September 17, 2012
I agree with Todd and Donalyn. If Romney had taken a more high-minded approach and offered statements to the effect that he wasn’t going to politicize things, and he wanted to offer to help broker meetings between top GOP brass and Obama and himself to talk over strategy and challenges in private, I think that would have showcased his leadership potential better than his vigorous attacks on the administration (which, in any case, weren’t factually correct). Of course, Romney is falling behind in this race and he desperately needs to transform the narrative of this race–to find a game changer. So he’s in a bit of a box, politically, and on that level alone his actions are understandable, though a bit unseemly.
Tony Robinson
September 28, 2012
I also wanted to note that although this blog post offers solid analysis that has by now become conventional wisdom (showing that your early analysis was astute and your criticism of Romney seems accurate in terms of how the electorate seems to has responded in general to Romney’s tactics on this issue), it would definitely have benefitted from a bit more evidence that Romney’s stunt was being seen as desperate at the time you wrote this post. There were many other commentators out there who were advancing a similar argument, and links to some of those arguments would have made this post more persuasive, and added a bit of length and depth to your argument. Are there any examples of candidates or leaders taking a high-minded approach and supporting the current leader and then being rewarded for it, as you suggest? Citing one would be good. A good example would have been the way Reagan responded when Jimmy Carters helicopter rescue failed…